Thursday, July 29, 2010
Monday, July 26, 2010
Mechanix Monday
In the tradition of Turtle Tchotchke Tuesdays I present Mechanix Mondays, devoted to the lighlights of the August 1933 issue of Modern Mechanix and Inventions (which is the only issue that Harvard owns). This week I present the cover!
August is the season for lost gold treasure hunts! Our hunter sports a tomato-red diving suit with golden fittings and chic claw-style artificial hands. Happy hunting!
August is the season for lost gold treasure hunts! Our hunter sports a tomato-red diving suit with golden fittings and chic claw-style artificial hands. Happy hunting!
Friday, July 23, 2010
Friday Foodfest
Here's what JB brought for lunch today.
Very healthy, but Diane brought in some fudge for everybody!
It was delicious and so easy; here's the recipe. Thanks, Diane.
UPDATE: This recipe works well with Butterscotch chips too!
UPDATE: This recipe works well with Butterscotch chips too!
Monday, July 19, 2010
Chuck's Flying Saucer
Chuck says there is a flying saucer in this picture. I marked the two places where it might have been traveling in red.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
A Nostalgia Fix
During my freshman week (1973) there was an outdoor screening of The President's Analyst at my dorm (Hanszen College). I remember it being slow in the first half. In the name of nostalgia, I decided to re-view it. This time I enjoyed it all the way through. Silly but fun. Perhaps my powers concentration have sharpened with age. I did remember this part, presented below, that spoofed those Bell Lab films we used to see in school. Enjoy!
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
A Ghostly Omen?
As my regular readers know, I recently bemoaned the absense of The Bird's Nest from the Library of America edition of Shirley Jackson's work. Then, what should show up on the hedge in front of Lamont but an actual bird's nest!
Perhaps, as Steve suggested, a tree-pruner found the nest and placed it there.....or, could it be a sign from the ghost of Shirley Jackson signaling her agreement with me?
UPDATE: The LOA is planning another volume that will include The Bird's Nest. So I guess I will have to retract my haunting-curse on J.C. Oates.
Perhaps, as Steve suggested, a tree-pruner found the nest and placed it there.....or, could it be a sign from the ghost of Shirley Jackson signaling her agreement with me?
UPDATE: The LOA is planning another volume that will include The Bird's Nest. So I guess I will have to retract my haunting-curse on J.C. Oates.
Sunday, July 11, 2010
Saturday, July 10, 2010
What Are Ghosts Anyway?
Yesterday in the staff room Chris and I were talking about supernatural fiction. He was saying that ghost stories were, in a sense, out of date, since people don't believe in ghosts anymore. How could a modern person get scared? Only movies could do the job with their appalling special effects.
I was struggling to explain my own love of some supernatural fiction; fiction in which the ghosts are taken seriously as characters and there is real character development. I kept getting stuck in my explanations. I think the ghost has to have a psychological connection with a living character, but I don't want to say that the ghost symbolizes somebody's repressed something-or-other. Then people are bound to think I mean it is just in the character's mind. "Just in somebody's mind" usually means, "It's not real." It means one is taking a pitying or smug attitude towards that character: "Poor thing! She's obviously nuts." (I hate studies of The Turn of the Screw that take that attitude.) I'm a Jungian; I believe in the reality of the psyche. I think the mind is more than an epiphenomenon of the brain. I believe in Rupert Sheldrake's "extended mind." As far as ghosts go, I neither believe nor disbelieve that ghostly phenomenon are spirits of the dead. So if a ghost in a story is acting out some unconscious complex of a living character, that doesn't diminish the reality of the ghost character at all.
And, speaking of supernatural fiction, I had been eagerly awaiting the Library of America edition of Shirley Jackson's work. In particular, I was looking forward to owning her novel The Bird's Nest, which is not available new at a reasonable price. (I read the Widener copy.) I could have bought a grimey old paperback, but I would so much prefer to reread it printed on crackling fresh new pages. But what a disappointment! The editor of that edition, Joyce Carol Oates, didn't think The Bird's Nest was good enough to include. In fact, in the interview of the LOA site, Oates admiration of Jackson sounded rather restrained. She also makes that distinction (which I disdain) between ghosts that are "psychological" and ones that are "real" I am pissed, and I hope Oates gets thouroughly haunted by Jackson's ghost.
UPDATE: The LOA is planning another volume that will include The Bird's Nest. So I guess I will have to retract my haunting-curse on J.C. Oates.
I was struggling to explain my own love of some supernatural fiction; fiction in which the ghosts are taken seriously as characters and there is real character development. I kept getting stuck in my explanations. I think the ghost has to have a psychological connection with a living character, but I don't want to say that the ghost symbolizes somebody's repressed something-or-other. Then people are bound to think I mean it is just in the character's mind. "Just in somebody's mind" usually means, "It's not real." It means one is taking a pitying or smug attitude towards that character: "Poor thing! She's obviously nuts." (I hate studies of The Turn of the Screw that take that attitude.) I'm a Jungian; I believe in the reality of the psyche. I think the mind is more than an epiphenomenon of the brain. I believe in Rupert Sheldrake's "extended mind." As far as ghosts go, I neither believe nor disbelieve that ghostly phenomenon are spirits of the dead. So if a ghost in a story is acting out some unconscious complex of a living character, that doesn't diminish the reality of the ghost character at all.
And, speaking of supernatural fiction, I had been eagerly awaiting the Library of America edition of Shirley Jackson's work. In particular, I was looking forward to owning her novel The Bird's Nest, which is not available new at a reasonable price. (I read the Widener copy.) I could have bought a grimey old paperback, but I would so much prefer to reread it printed on crackling fresh new pages. But what a disappointment! The editor of that edition, Joyce Carol Oates, didn't think The Bird's Nest was good enough to include. In fact, in the interview of the LOA site, Oates admiration of Jackson sounded rather restrained. She also makes that distinction (which I disdain) between ghosts that are "psychological" and ones that are "real" I am pissed, and I hope Oates gets thouroughly haunted by Jackson's ghost.
UPDATE: The LOA is planning another volume that will include The Bird's Nest. So I guess I will have to retract my haunting-curse on J.C. Oates.
Labels:
Book review,
death,
Jungian psychology,
supernatural
Tuesday, July 06, 2010
Italy in 1995
Saturday, July 03, 2010
Dinner at Chez Nouveau Julie and Dave
Julie & Dave moved into a wonderful condo in Arlington. It's on a quiet street leading into some lovely conservation land. Last night they fed Sue and me at their new digs.
The kitchen is a muted mustard color that goes well with Dave's cap.
Sue is back from Italy. She brought us some pasta that we ate with pesto, parmesan, and pine nuts. She brought us jars of truffles.
Julie gives her new kitchen a workout and puts together four beautiful salads:
Stanley and Clifford are still getting used to their new home.
Here's something I've never seen before: a lard hole. Under this lid is a bucket into which householders would dump their old lard. Periodically the lard collector would collect the lard.
Time for a snooze.
The kitchen is a muted mustard color that goes well with Dave's cap.
Sue is back from Italy. She brought us some pasta that we ate with pesto, parmesan, and pine nuts. She brought us jars of truffles.
Julie gives her new kitchen a workout and puts together four beautiful salads:
Stanley and Clifford are still getting used to their new home.
Here's something I've never seen before: a lard hole. Under this lid is a bucket into which householders would dump their old lard. Periodically the lard collector would collect the lard.
Time for a snooze.
Thursday, July 01, 2010
The Discreet Charm of Old TV
I am now watching episodes of Secret Agent, which evolved from Danger Man. John Drake is sophisticated and poker-faced, but he has a heart. Unlike 007, he doesn't make jokes about hooligans he has dispatched. For Drake, death is never hilarious.
What's with this penchant of mine for old TV and movies? I don't believe they represent a golden age of innocence, nor do I merely sneer at the outmoded beliefs and think myself superior to all these people now dead or very old. Maybe it's some strange synergy of both, or neither.
What's with this penchant of mine for old TV and movies? I don't believe they represent a golden age of innocence, nor do I merely sneer at the outmoded beliefs and think myself superior to all these people now dead or very old. Maybe it's some strange synergy of both, or neither.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Back From the Berkshires
I spent a longish weekend in the Berkshires with Brenda, an old college buddy. We stayed in Lee, MA. We shopped in Lenox, where I bought a light, tencil shirt with a Japanese-themed print. It came from a fun shop called The Purple Plume.
For more information, you may wish to consult my Picasa Web Album on the trip.
For more information, you may wish to consult my Picasa Web Album on the trip.
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Dynamic Duotones
Recently I've been fooling around with the duotone (tritone, quadtone) option on Photoshop, and I think I like it even better that HDR.
Monday, June 21, 2010
Really False Advertising
We all expect a little exaggeration in movie posters. For instance, in a Star Wars poster Princess Leia is pictured in a low-cut dress that she doesn't wear on screen. But I have discovered a case that goes too far. I recently purchased The Wasp Woman, a Roger Corman flick from 1959. Please examine the DVD cover art below:
So you would assume from this picture that the Wasp Woman had a wasp's body and the head of a pretty woman and was significantly larger than the average human being. But, when you watch the actual movie, what do you see?
The Wasp Woman has a woman's body and a waspy sort of head and is the same height as she is as a human woman.
So you would assume from this picture that the Wasp Woman had a wasp's body and the head of a pretty woman and was significantly larger than the average human being. But, when you watch the actual movie, what do you see?
The Wasp Woman has a woman's body and a waspy sort of head and is the same height as she is as a human woman.
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Condominium Life
I just love my condo association meetings. We had one tonight. The highlight of the evening was the story of a man whose window faced the pool. He wanted the tree near said window to be only lightly pruned and only on top, so that the branches would cut off people's view inside his place. However, the board felt that the trees should be pruned alike with the lower branches cut back. This guy said now his privacy was gone. (Why couldn't he use a curtain?) There followed a long discussion, which I won't even try to reproduce. Suffice it to say that it ended with this guy and our property manager calling each
other liars.
At that point I felt I had done my duty and left.
other liars.
At that point I felt I had done my duty and left.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
The Only Way I Could Enter this Contest
Today I received an e-mail from Amazon.com attempting to tempt me into signing up for e-mail alerts regarding stuff I would want to buy. In exchange, I would have the opportunity to win a $1000 gift card. I checked out the Official Rules and found this troubling statement:
"How to Enter. You may enter the Sweepstakes beginning at 12:00:01 a.m. (PST) on April 15, 2010 and ending at 11:59:59 p.m. (PST) on May 31, 2010 (the "Sweepstakes Period")."
There's only one way I could enter this sweepstakes:
"How to Enter. You may enter the Sweepstakes beginning at 12:00:01 a.m. (PST) on April 15, 2010 and ending at 11:59:59 p.m. (PST) on May 31, 2010 (the "Sweepstakes Period")."
There's only one way I could enter this sweepstakes:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)